Messaging app Telegram has recently announced a significant policy change, indicating that it will begin providing users’ IP addresses and phone numbers to relevant authorities in response to valid legal requests. CEO Pavel Durov made this announcement in a post on Telegram, stating that the updated terms of service are intended to deter criminal misuse of the platform. This change comes on the heels of Durov’s arrest in France, where he faces charges related to the alleged spread of child sexual abuse materials.
Historically, Telegram has been known for its non-compliance with government requests for data and its lax content moderation practices. Durov’s latest statement signifies a notable shift from the platform’s previous approach, which often involved ignoring takedown requests from governments worldwide.
This willingness to cooperate with legal authorities may reflect the growing pressure on tech companies to take a more active role in preventing criminal activities facilitated by their platforms.
In conjunction with these changes, Telegram is employing artificial intelligence and a team of moderators to better manage content on its platform. This includes concealing problematic content from search results as part of their effort to prevent misuse. Durov highlighted that these measures are part of a broader initiative aimed at enhancing user safety and addressing concerns about illegal activities.
Durov’s legal troubles have had a significant impact on Telegram’s policies. He has been ordered to remain in France during an ongoing investigation into allegations that the company failed to assist law enforcement with data requests for suspected criminals. Durov maintains his innocence, but the situation has prompted a reevaluation of Telegram’s operations in light of potential legal repercussions.
Under Durov’s leadership, Telegram has often found itself at the center of controversies, with governments ranging from the European Union to authoritarian regimes criticizing the platform.
While it has served as a tool for activists and protestors, it has also been linked to extremist groups, raising concerns about its dual role in society. The recent policy adjustments may indicate a shift towards greater accountability and moderation in response to both legal challenges and societal expectations.
